⚠️

Risk scores are statistical indicators based on prescribing patterns compared to specialty peers. They are NOT allegations of fraud, misconduct, or improper care. Many legitimate medical reasons can explain outlier prescribing.

Read our methodology →

Michael HumeniukMD

Internal Medicine · Spartanburg, SC 29303

NPI: 1942594155

Share:

32

🟠 Elevated

Risk Flags

High opioid rate vs specialty peersHigh cost outlier (population + peer)Elevated long-acting opioid rateHigh antipsychotic prescribing (65+)

Risk indicators are statistical patterns, not allegations. Learn more

2,340

Total Claims

$4.2M

Drug Cost

352

Beneficiaries

$12K

Cost/Patient

Risk Score Breakdown 32/100

Low (0)Moderate (15)Elevated (30)High (50+)
Opioid rate vs specialty peers+10
Elderly antipsychotic prescribing+10
Cost per patient outlier+6
Long-acting opioid rate+4

Score components are additive. Read full methodology

Peer Comparison vs. 110,156 Internal Medicine providers

+412%

Opioid rate vs peers

11.5% vs 2.2% avg

+743%

Cost per patient vs peers

$12K vs $1,411 avg

🔎 Data Overview

💊

Opioid rate is 412% above Internal Medicine peers. This is a significant deviation that may reflect a specialized patient population or concerning prescribing patterns.

💰

Cost per patient is 743% above the specialty average. Extreme cost outliers may indicate prescribing of unnecessarily expensive brand-name drugs or inappropriate drug utilization.

Insights generated from CMS data analysis. Statistical patterns are not accusations — always consider clinical context.

Opioid Prescribing

11.5%

Opioid Rate

268

Opioid Claims

$9,954

Opioid Cost

19.8%

Long-Acting Rate

Brand vs Generic

100% generic

Brand: 0 claims · $0

Generic: 2,092 claims · $2.0M

Patient Profile

72

Avg Age

26%

Female

2.28

Avg Risk Score

Explore More

Data from CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File, 2023. Risk scores are statistical indicators, not allegations.Methodology · About