Brand vs Generic: The Billion-Dollar Gap

Share:𝕏fin

Generic drugs are bioequivalent to their brand-name counterparts but cost a fraction of the price. Every brand-name prescription where a generic exists represents potential waste — and the numbers add up fast.

The Overall Picture

In 2023, Medicare Part D spent $185.46B on brand-name drugs and $39.45B on generics. The overall brand rate across all prescribers is approximately 13.4%.

Specialties with Highest Brand Rates

Some specialties have legitimately high brand rates (oncology, for example, relies on patented biologics). But others raise questions:

SpecialtyProvidersAvg Brand %Drug Cost
Pharmacy12896.9%$3.0M
Pharmacist36,12095.3%$1.52B
Pulmonary Disease9,77171.7%$8.87B
Critical Care (Intensivists)2,04166.3%$914.8M
Endocrinology6,58353.6%$9.71B
Medical Genetics and Genomics12052.8%$92.8M
Optometry33,19140.8%$1.70B
Ophthalmology19,64739.1%$4.25B
Allergy/ Immunology3,98238.9%$1.62B
Hematology85437.4%$1.31B

Why It Matters

The FDA requires generics to demonstrate bioequivalence — same active ingredient, same dosage, same route of administration. Yet brand loyalty persists among some providers, driven by pharmaceutical marketing, patient demand, or clinical inertia.

Shifting just 10% of unnecessary brand prescriptions to generics could save Medicare hundreds of millions annually — money that could extend Part D's solvency or reduce patient copays.

See the full breakdown: Brand vs Generic Explorer →

Related Analysis

View all analysis →